Philip Morris USA v. Williams. Brief facts Case Study

Philip Morris USA v. Williams. Brief facts - Case Study practice sessionAt initial effort the gore awarded her $821,485.50 as compensatory restoration and $79.5 million as punitive damages in the part. However, the trial judiciary on an appeal reduced the amounts to $521,485.50 and $32 million respectively. On an turn over appeal the Oregon courtyard of Appeals reversed the trial courts decision and upheld the earlier amount awarded by the jury as compensation. The Supreme apostrophize of United States granted certiorari in the case, vacated the tourist court of Appeals judgment and displace back the case to the same court of appeal to reconsider the amount of punitive damages awarded in the case. In particular Supreme Court referring to the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment declined to grant punitive damages to individuals who were not part of judicial proceeding. In a third appeal before the Supreme Court by Philips Morris the court remanded the case back f or re-trial.The basic issues before the jury, trial court, court of appeal and the arbitrary court were varied. The Court had to decide that if compensatory and punitive damages are made out in the case and if they are maintainable and to be awarded then to what extent.Ans. The basic jurisdiction in this lied till the Court of Appeal in the state of Oregon. ... Ans. The case had been in the litigation process for ten years.3. What is jurisdiction in relation to this caseAns. The basic jurisdiction in this lied till the Court of Appeal in the state of Oregon. The deceased and the plaintiff belonged to that state. After that on further appeal and review petitions the case was act by the Supreme Court of United States.4. What is the relationship between the court system, litigation process, and jurisdictionAns. at that place is a threefold relationship between the court system, litigation process and jurisdiction. If we take the example of the throw case then we see that the deceas ed and the Plaintiff(his wife) lived in the State of Oregon, so the jurisdiction of the district court lied in there case. Jurisdiction is of three types. Personal, Territorial and Subject matter. In this case the territorial reserve jurisdiction was made out. The Court system is divided according to the jurisdiction of a State. First its the trial Court of the State, then the Court of Appeal and further it can also be Supreme Court. The litigation process is said to be started from the trial Court and can go up to Supreme Court till the final decision has not been arrived at.References www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/03/AR2008120303377.html